Plurality Intergration

Kommentare

6 Kommentare

  • Nexys

    Seconded! I think plural integration would be a great feature to add. And especially since it's an opt-in feature, the people who wouldn't want to use it wouldn't have to. As a sort of side-suggestion: maybe making two checkboxes, one that says 'this is for plural use', and the other that says 'this is for roleplay proxying'? That way users can know right away without having to ask whether or not the user is a system or a roleplayer.

    Some people get really fired up about the thought of adding plural integration to Discord, but I think it would help greatly with normalizing plurality and raising awareness, which would be good for our community! :)

    10
  • Izumi Midoriya

    Agreed! Bringing awareness is actually really important in my opinion too aha, since it'd allow more people to adjust/learn about it!

    9
  • Digitall_Fox

    And for security reasons I think a proxy account could be linked back to the owner of the proxy. This could be rolled out as a role permission feature as well to minimize early abuse of this proxy system

    10
  • RainbowNight

    Agreed. As a coder, though I've never worked on Discord, I imagine this as a type of subaccount; changing name, icon, status, roles, etc, but inherently linked to the "main" or "base" account as its parent; an option to even have that in the nickname (e.g. subname | basename) or details could be very useful. Any unspecified areas of a new subaccount could take on the main as default. As a member of the community, I think the ability to mark roleplay vs systemhood would be very important; we get far too many people assuming that systems are roleplaying when we are not, resulting in gatekeeping of bots such as pluralkit and tupperbox to avoid confusion and mocking. I also agree that regardless of design, being able to link these accounts back to the main will be very important for mods. For roleplaying, simply to control the player, and for systemhood, due to the concept of "system responsibility"; that a whole system shares responsibility for the actions of its members. This helps avoid mindreading attempts, in-system identity theft, and other issues. 

    To measure the popularity of this, simply watch how quickly PluralKit is growing in number of servers it works for, and know that systems frequently use it for nearly every single message they send. This would be much more efficient if that work was integrated instead of by bot, and could be pushed more clientside than serverside. (Also, we could finally stop having "bot" tags and being treated as inhuman because of that). 

     

    Thank you for your time and consideration. 

    3
  • Nexys

    Another thought I had the other day (but I couldn't remember how to get to this page lol, so decided to wait for someone else to comment and get an email) was that this would make it so the feature would never go down anymore. Sometimes bots crash/go offline, which can interrupt conversations on tens of thousands of servers, even if it's only down for just two minutes. As of this comment, PK is in 192,343 servers. When we first started using the bot, it was only in maybe 60 or 70,000. It's clear that this is becoming a highly necessary tool. We've even seen the bot used in servers where Plurality is absolutely not the purpose (nor roleplay). So devs, please consider making Discord the first major platform to integrate plural-friendly tools. <3

    2
  • Gøℓ๔en๖ۣۜ山øℓf

    Also, for some systems having  multiple accounts, have it linkable to certain accounts only from the main (or first) account it was linked to

    3

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.