
asciidude
hi
- Gesamtaktivitäten 49
- Letzte Aktivität
- Mitglied seit
- Folge ich 0 Benutzer
- Gefolgt von 1 Benutzer
- Stimmen 23
- Abonnements 11
Aktivitätsübersicht
Neueste Aktivität von asciidude-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
Discord uses (and must use) a database for guilds. Inside this guild model would be an array of roles, that is what I'm referring to, as they append a role any new role. It shouldn't take super lon...
-
asciidude hat einen Post erstellt
Faster save times for roles
Writing to a database should not take an entire minute for one role.
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
Gotta give this a +1 This is a must, it sucks Discord hasn't added it yet. It's so simple too
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
No offense (continues to say something offensive lol), but I think this suggestion is dumb. Most bots disable DM commands. I do on all my bots as well, since it always breaks the bot in some type o...
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
Side note, they can also create webhooks, which are just as easy and may even be the same as this, they just have to find the right service. There's also bot creation services out there that are fr...
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
The way Discord is for *developers* is good as it is. I kind of see why you want this added, but if the server owner wants to make a simple bot it's not that hard. I will, in fact, provide some cod...
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
It's better to not overflow the service with connections. They have to access tons of APIs already just to link the accounts. But I do like where you're going with this. I should add on that apps l...
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
Just no.
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
I'm aware this is a three year old thread, but I'd still like to make my comment on this. Discord should NOT add this feature, it WILL increase toxicity on the app overall and make many stop using ...
-
asciidude hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen
You could juse use the MESSAGE_SEND event