Comments

97 comments

  • Mineboy4Lyfe

    If not for general users, at least increase it for Nitro users. If Nitro increased the server limit, I would feel much more inclined to get it.

    74
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Roberto

    Note: Please upvote my comment if you agree in full or in part with any of the following. This comment has been heavily refined.


    My personal reason for wanting this feature

    Whilst I may not be consistantly active on all the servers I am a member in concurrently, I do have specific reasons for being in each server beyond the unimportant reason of emoji servers. This if for the same reason I don't limit myself with the number of websites I hold accounts on. I have various topic-realted discords, for eample, for various programming languages, various games I play, and so on. Rather than having to record possibly non-permantant invite links, and only joining servers when they become relevant to me, I would like to retain an archive of servers to access at my liesure.


    The neccessity of server catagories, grouping, or folders

    In tendem with this feature, it is important to add an organisation feature to allow users to group their servers into catagories. Discords has grown from a small-community gaming-oriented platform to a large social network, and as such, should nolong be limited as so. A user should atleast be ably to have single-level catagories, or, ideally, mmulti-leveld tree-structure catagories. Some example catagories would be, 'Streaming', 'Game', 'Friends', 'Programming', 'Official', 'Partnerships', and, ofcourse, 'Misc.'.

    Proposal: decreasing required resources

    If the reason for a limit is predominantly client-side lag, I would support removing the limit in favour of adding a warning.

    I suppose that, if required to decrease resources used, notifications be limited to the existing server limit, but allow the user to ad servers past that limit. This could possibly be executed by automatically fully muting servers added past the existing server limit, and of course notifiyign the user of this, as well as only allowing a maximum of the currect limit of servers to be unmuted. Additionally considering negation of resources used by fully-muted servers would be important.

    64
    Comment actions Permalink
  • x1o1Adamx

    How how having an UNLIMITED AMOUNT of servers to join

    29
    Comment actions Permalink
  • DJboutit

    Make it 250 for normal users and nitro users 400

    26
    Comment actions Permalink
  • kelvinnkat

    That limit's pretty lame.

    23
    Comment actions Permalink
  • 𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟕 ♡

    yes pls discord plssss 

    21
    Comment actions Permalink
  • karl-police

    Please add this for every user, more servers :)

     

    I mean what are bots doing

    12
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Bisounourstueur

    For me, increasing the amount of server that can be reached is a good idea, and that both for people with Nitro, and those without Nitro

    actually, making a limit increase would not be heavy, but behind a few people are active on 100 servers at a time, those with 100 servers often have 80-90 servers for Global Emote, which are emotes usable anywhere without to have Discord Nitro.

    for my part, not going Nitro, I want this limit of 100 servers no longer exist, yes it would be difficult to set up, because it would do a lot of things charged, but to counter this, we could think of creating "Server Regrouping" a feature that would belike the message bubble Messenger but in the boxes of the servers, section where we could expect to group up to 25 servers, to reduce the load by saying to the application / software "Tien, you show me that the @everyone notifications in this group, but not in this one, neither in this one! "

    To give the example, I have 99 servers (I left a personal server because useless)and I know that my proposal to help increase this limit would allow me to make a group with servers or I am active, and groups for Global Emote servers, which are in my eyes, formidable servers with the possibility of their share us with emoteswithout putting 1 cent, just by staying on their server, and make them known, and they are rewarded by the ads they make for other servers!

    Me, in general I am for the increase of the limit, but it should be done slowly, in stages of 50 by 50, to see how much of server Discord could have worries

    11
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Koro | Gateway2.SNSK.KIRBS.SONCI

    I want to be in 911199192 servers. That is a good limit.

    9
    Comment actions Permalink
  • GΛLΛXY CΛT

    Or have more for nitro subscribers and if they are no longer nitro then when they leave a guild they won’t be able to add more until they are nitro again, I personally thought nitro users could have 150 because I counted but I guess I was off by a lot. And after digging around I found that it’s just 100 guilds.

    8
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Yupi

    Yes, quit the limit please!!!

    8
    Comment actions Permalink
  • stain

    i think i might honestly get nitro just for a higher limit. every server is so precious and nostalgic — how can i just leave?! ((especially if it’s a PRIVATE server!!))

    7
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Frosty
    Actually, it'd be better to do it for nitro users.
    6
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Aliya İzzet Begoviç

    I`m waiting for it! :)

    6
    Comment actions Permalink
  • LittleWhole

    This NEEDS TO BE A THING! I've had to rely on multiple alts just to overcome this limit! This is so annoying. At least make it for Nitro users. Please, Discord!

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Chojin

    +1.

    I have to be aware of many servers and just cannot leave them.

    Make it to Nitro users so you will for sure have more subscribers.

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Froh

    A lot of serveur does advertise news (on games, on communities, etc). You don't need to contribute to the servs in order to read the news. So this argument is kinda bland.

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Zach

    Having the limit literally encourages making alternate accounts which is not good.

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • rebane2001

    This is especially important right now, as the coronavirus situation requires many students to use Discord for communications with their teachers - a different server for each subject. Add to that the servers for keeping in touch with your friends and family and you quickly reach the 100 server limit without even having any prior server.

    I understand that certain operations (eg mutual servers for friends) will break or become very slow - but those are non-essential. I'd much rather not know that xXx_ProGam4r69_xXx is also in a Minecraft server I'm in if it means I won't have to deny joining a server to chat with my relatives.

    Maybe it'd make sense to have the ability to sort of "archive" servers, where you'll still stay in them, but certain features will be slowed down or turn off whatsoever to keep the Discord running smoothly

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Owenn

    This would be great even if it is just 150 for nitro users this would be really good.

    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Noah
    This would be a huge nitro selling point for me; it seems everyday I'm having to leave servers to join a server that I'll just have to leave later. 👍
    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • asheraryam

    I will buy nitro IMMEDIATELY if I get to have more than 100 servers.

     

    I have a lot of servers and I am currently making multiple accounts to be able to keep them.

    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Ult1mat3

    Why is this not a thing yet?

    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Duckers McQuack

    More for nitro members would not work. What if you have to cancel nitro for financial reasons? will you still be able to keep said 150-200 servers on the account, but not able to join more unless you leave those extra 50-100 extra?

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • karl-police

    What if there is a server join slot system.

    Like not everyone can join the same amount of servers but everyone can join atleast 100 min. and depending on how old your account is you unlock more slots, like 50 or something?

    Or donating with Nitro one time will unlock +50 slots that you keep forever?

     

    DM and Servers are not the same but.

     

    Is there a DM limit though?

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • scottrepreneur

    I will 100% pay for Nitro, at a manageably increased rate even, for this feature. Restricting 100+ to Nitro users minimizes strain and promotes premium subscription, no brainer.

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • bean

    I agree with this, server limit should be removed.  Now for anyone who doesn't know what this is(since I didn't at first), server limit is something that limits the amount of servers you can be in.  Once you join 100 servers, you cannot join anymore.  For the people who think "that's not a big deal who would ever join over 100 servers!"  Youtubers.  Youtubers join a lot of servers.  Fan servers, their own servers, other youtubers's servers, basically what I'm saying is youtubers join a lot of servers.  Prove me wrong if I am, but I don't think I am.

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Wei4Green

    I’d rather have the server-limit removed. But if it doesn't work, then I think I'm fine with a 200–500 server-limit.

    Currently Discord also has a 500-user note limit for users. There's also a user note-limit proposal that is similar to this proposal. If you're also seeking to increase or remove the limit of user notes please go there and upvote it.

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • ELITE NOTORIOUS The Supremacist

    Does discord even look at these posts? I mean it would all be pointless if they don't reply or view it.

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Hexandcube

    +1

     

     

    2
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.