Bring back our selfbots!

No planeada


47 comentarios

  • TheCloaker

    I think that discord should add back self bots they are a lot of fun to use and very handy in some ways now to address the "Huge" security issue their can me very easy ways to patch the issue, also I might add that for everytime their is a force stopping something their we be something to fight back their are still people self-boting even though it is against the rules and it is undetected! so I think just building a self-bot api beside the existing bot api will be amazing for the geeky community and the guy that created this thread has ALOT of very good points like the way for server owners to disable the feature :D I do hope that you guys that discord reopen this fun rabbit hole.

  • Bobby(buizel)#3313

    I see no reason bringing back Discord selfbot they are used for malicious intent

  • alistair

    My two cents...

    Allow for things like selfbotted messages and embeds (presences can already be done programatically) with an exclusive selfbot API with marginally higher rate limits. Additionally, allow for servers and users dms to disable the API if they don't want selfbots there. Finally, on every message sent programatically, place a minute border to the left or something visually indicating that the message was not sent my a human – making it easier for others and yourself to distinguish between the different messages.

  • cmppc

    the only reason why i need self bot is for being able to include discord in my app. i use my rpi for controlling my led and i already include the facebook api so i can acess my msg when gaming. dx12 dont like shift tab or some game like league of legend, metal gear survive, conan exile you need to disable all overlay. so discord become useless if i cannot access with overlay and shift tab 


  • Willow

    Option 2. I think selfbots were a great way for younger users to learn how to use the API. We should be able to use them without paying, and we should see about hiring a team of people to moderate. I think a selfbot mode in the server would be excellent.

  • Matthewxd234 (Dank Epic Gamer)

    IMO bring back self bots BUT just limit then ie cant send 5 msgs in 2 seconds or smth like that to stop spam and a few other thing too. So im agreeing to bring back self bots

  • JackTEK

    Rather than allowing any old Nitro user to create self-bots, how about Verified Bot Developers instead? Let's be honest, no bad actor is going to go through the lengthy process of verification (and adding it into 100 placeholder servers doesn't work either), so this is a better alternative in my opinion. It gives Discord peace of mind at least.

    I doubt I'd ever have any need for a self-bot, but other users seem to have some pretty valid reasons for wanting self-bots to come back. Just an idea.

  • Wyatt

    Doubt they'll be bringing back selfbots after situations like and h0nda.

    I'd also rather not let people have full access to all my private channels and everything.

    Why can't just you use regular bots?
    If there's something they can't do you either find another way around or just deal with it.

  • RisingX

    This is never gonna happen

    When a company makes a change and the people vote to reverse that change, that is proper. But doing that without a justification is not proper. For one, people have mentioned the security issues already, if you have a lever that leads to a virus, but you get to eat a cookie, and it is pulled you get a virus for a object that isnt worth much, they didnt pull the lever leaving that cookie. Point is, the use of self-bots is a massive security issue that causes tons of issues with discord, and imagine the uses for people making viruses, you get random links that take your account and dm the rest of your contacts? A cookie is not as worth as much as discord

    Get over your need for self-bots and maybe try finding work arounds or just give up

  • AlexejheroYTB

    If you want to ban selfbots, at least give regular bots access to all features of the API! (User Connections?)

  • ! ✞ Draco'DKZ ℱ𝑒́ ♡

    Tem meu total apoio para a volta de selfbots, é necessário e ajuda servidores pequenos à crescer.


    Thanks for the translation Daniel
    My phone automatically translated but thanks

  • TKtony

    i want the music!!!!!!


  • undermaster
    Selfbots is actually not a good idea. Even though only Nitro Users can make selfbots. Selfbots can cause raids which is actually not a good odea
  • Kiwis

    According to Google Translate:

    Hello, I am an expensive user to disagree and I come to ask for self-returns to come back, so that the servers can grow and even disclose a discord to the people who do not use the application. The main components of the application are not being completed and are not disaggregated. Without the aid of artificial intelligence (autobot) the application ended up being little used what shows itself in bankruptcy. I ask for an understanding of all the programs of discord, and that it be as before.

    This was not edited whatsoever.

  • PRIZ ;]

    Self bots are against the terms of service, if you want a bot then make one, if you want links create an adverts channel
    Translated:  Self bots are against the terms of service, if you want a bot then make one, if you want links create an ad placement

  • brxxn

    This poses a huge security concern. People might not like your selfbot on their server, which is why bot users exist. You also are encouraged to get your own token, and most users have eval commands on their selfbot. That's why bot users exist, and you shouldn't automate your account.


Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario.