New Permission: "Assign Roles"

コメント

73件のコメント

  • Knagie

    Possibly it is Vasp but they wouldn't be able to use the Discord interface to do so. Not everyone is good with chat commands to setup roles. I prefer to use the interface as it is easy to just quickly skim over it to see any permissions that might be off or on which shouldn't be. 

    It would be a good addition to split those permissions.

    13
  • kiwiSpecial

    This is a really great idea that I had also thought about. It's always seemed that the "Manage Roles" permission was too broad. Splitting up "Assigning" and "Managing" would be great!

    13
  • No Mercy

    I like this idea, I would love for it to be implemented into Discord.

    12
  • tt2468

    This would be an awesome feature to have natively in the client. +1 for sure.

     

    OP if you are looking for a way to implement a similar feature to this, you can set up a bot that has manage roles and accepts commands from your moderators. For example, you could script it so that `!addrole @user (Role name/id)` adds the role to a user. That would allow you to log what your mods are doing and also allows them to assign roles without manage roles permission.

    10
  • SSWEEEE

    Over a year old, is 400+ up votes enough



    10
  • Kiwis

    i like that

    9
  • R C N
    Great idea!! hope they will add it.
    8
  • Virulent

    That is one astonishing idea you got there. Not only will mistakes be reduced, but many complications with trollers will be fixed. If this was added it would help out a lot. 

    8
  • nbamadden0

    Greatest idea I have ever heard, would make it so much easier for moderators on a server!

    8
  • Rika

    Brilliant idea dude.

    7
  • gamer6

    Would definitely need this one.

    Permission to give permission specified roles.

    7
  • John Reese

    No, currently when you have permission to manage the roles you can only manage the roles below you and I propose that we can define to a role the permission to manage this or that role but not the roles as a following.

    5
  • John Reese
    Exactly
    5
  • monte cristo sandwhich

    This is a must. In addition to being able to create / edit roles. Giving someone the "Manage Role" permissions allows them unlimited ability to change permissions in a channel even for roles above them, unless the "manage permissions" role in that specific channel is set to X, which you have to do for every channel they have access to.

    5
  • ShadowOp

    Agree completely with cristo, I had to assign X to 100 channels on my server because of this.

    4
  • T_Ray_TV

    This is a great idea.  This would allow low level managers (like Moderators) to be more useful without giving them the opportunity to screw everything up, accidentally or otherwise.

    4
  • Seraph

    It's absolutely absurd that this isn't already the case. Not only can they adjust roles beneath them globally, but they can actually go into a particular channel and then give themselves permission that they shouldn't have. Only way around this is to either not assign that permission or to disabled manage permissions in every channel, in which case, what's even the point.

    "Manage Roles" was definitely not thought out well. We need adjust roles.

    4
  • Bauer5266

    We definitely need to split the "assign role" and "edit roles" security inside our servers. You cannot trust people won't destroy your discord.

    4
  • CaptainAustralian

    It sounds like a really epic feature for discord to put in. 

    4
  • Pythros

    A year-old for a simple must-have function for server moderation. 🤷‍♂️

    4
  • Tuff3!

    We really need this!

     

     

    4
  • Sabin

    I second this idea. I would add the ability to choose from a list which roles this person can assign, instead of just "all roles below this one".

    Example: My server has 3 clans, call them Red, Green, and Blue. There are Generals and Members. The Generals should have permission to add and remove people from their own clan, but not the other clans. The problem with "all roles below this one" is that not only can a General assign and manage ALL of the Clan Member roles, but whichever General role is listed first can modify the other Generals!

    Everyone on my server agrees that bots are good for add-on functions (playing music, rolling dice), but shouldn't be used to manage the server or build a community around; i.e. if the bot stops working one day, the server/game won't be FUBAR. The only non-bot workaround I can find is having a separate server for each clan. But we all play the game together and we are friends despite being in opposing clans. We have an "All" area where we chat about the game and non-game stuff. So this would necessitate a fourth server. Four servers for one group of friends just to get the permissions right seems a bit... excessive.

    This feature would eliminate all of that nonsense! Please please make it happen.

    4
  • MaDMardigan

    I tried a workaround to get an similar result. so i created a role "promoter" just over the role i wanted them to promote to. unfortunately if i a assign the role to someone with a higher role, the "promoter" role will also allow them to promote to the higher roles. 

    Even the workaround using the role hierarchic system doesnt work because it doesnt allow you to edit roles just to this new role. :(
    So we definitely need some  better role management. I want other people helping me to assign roles to new members but i dont want them to edit and promote to every role!

    vote for this :)

     
    3
  • Geebus

    I also wish they would add a toggleable permission to only allow them to edit / add and remove people to certain roles. 

    2
  • EchoFox

    Exactly what I came on here to suggest until I saw this post, c'mon Discord! This should have been an obvious permission to have. And I think better wording for it would be "Assign Roles". Cool to see I'm not the only one wanting something like this.

    2
  • EchoFox

    Exactly what I came on here to suggest until I saw this post, c'mon Discord! This should have been an obvious permission to have. And I think better wording for it would be "Assign Roles". Cool to see I'm not the only one wanting something like this.

    2
  • Miguel R.

    This is a great idea!

    2
  • RikaRoleplay

    These changes would be a game changer for discord, I was surprised when I was setting up servers, I had to rely on bots that didn't exactly do what I needed.  What I needed was a further breakdown of the permissions, specifically Manage Roles, since I don't want them creating new roles or such.  I need members to assign a tag that would allow people to @ them, but then remove it when they are done with it since it is a tag lower than their main discord tag. 

    Similarly, having a Role that is better for moderators to individually change ranks of other members as long as their "mod" rank is higher than the rank they are giving or taking away would be a simple fix in my eyes compared to how many bots do it, which sometimes leads to someone you didn't intend on giving power, able to give anyone a role higher than themselves, including themselves, then basically troll and delete everything.  

    This is especially true when setting up such perms for a public server.  I hope these changes written by Shibiko ar implemented within the next few months, as it would for the most part remove the dependencies my communities have on other applications besides discord.  

    2
  • whimsyy

    I think that would be a really good idea- as someone who owns a server with 200+ users, it could be really helpful to be able to assign this for any new users that join, so the moderators could easily assign roles, without the risk of any role titles being changed etc. I like this idea a lot.

    2
  • vodiN

    +1 valve, pls fix

    2

サインインしてコメントを残してください。