This is an archived community post.

This post is no longer open for new replies - but we'd still love to hear from you! Share your feedback with our team via our Feedback Form.

Need help getting started? Check out this article for step-by-step instructions on submitting feedback through the form.

Server boosting shouldn't need 1-year subscribers to keep it boosted

Maggie
  • Edytowano

I'm not sure if the server boosts will be gone if someone loses their Nitro subscription (expires), but if it does, please make it so that it doesn't happen. I think it'd be unfair if someone who doesn't earn a lot of income or is a student has to purchase Nitro often in order to get their server boosted. 

Example: 

- Person A and Person B boost Server 1. 

- Server 1 goes from level 1 to level 2 boost. 

- Person A was only a 1 month subscriber, and their Nitro expired after the boost.

If Person A lost their Nitro, Server 1 shouldn't "level down" or "lose 1 boost" (if that makes sense). I think it's more fair to those that have smaller and private servers if we don't always have to have someone keep getting Nitro. It wouldn't be fair to those with lower income or in need of money but want to make their servers/community nicer with perks for their friends. 

I hope you consider this. Thank you!

19

Komentarze

Komentarze: 3

Data Głosy
  • SymplyFled

    I'm agreed with that.

    5
  • LoneWalker

    Me too, if I had to constantly get Nitro just to keep my 30 person server at level 1, I would be broke. So if there if a way they can change this for smaller server, I  would be very happy.

    2
  • Mark♡

    agreed, i don’t really care if Discord has to pay its stuff many other platforms survive without premium subscriptions and this system would be unfair for smaller and private servers, who cares if we don’t need these features i don’t want a server of 500 people and i want to keep it private because big messy servers are lame

    0