This is an archived community post.

This post is no longer open for new replies - but we'd still love to hear from you! Share your feedback with our team via our Feedback Form.

Need help getting started? Check out this article for step-by-step instructions on submitting feedback through the form.

Partnership rejection feedback

Ferris | 냥냥즈 Lover
It would be really great if Discord actually took the time to educate servers who get partnership rejections on what they were missing to improve on in the 60 day waiting period instead of a robotic message that says nothing helpful. There's supposed to be a community advocate who looks over the servers outside the requirements to judge if they'll get partnership. None of that surveying gets told to server partners, so how are we supposed to know that we did something wrong?? Servers with 50+ DAILY chatters are getting rejected while smaller, less active servers are getting approved. This judgement system is leaving people blind as to what the problem is and it's unfair to leave us without a clue for 60 days only to probably get rejected again.
12

Comentários

3 comentários

Data Votos
  • Lukas

    Hey, I know this problem very well from some projects I lead.

    I agree in this case with you 100%!

    4
  • Natalie
    • Editado

    If an employee is joining applicants' servers and investigating, there's no reason they can't even give a sentence or two on what to improve on. It's very frustrating. 

    1
  • Berk

    Same! I always see small servers inactive for days that get accepted meanwhile there are other active and well-moderated communities that get rejected, and it's actually frustrating that they don't tell you how to improve, I personally know the reason for the rejection of mine (the minimum server retention for actively growing communities is 30%), but I saw a lot of cases of people that applied for partnerships and are well active and well-moderated communities with polite people and they get rejected without even advice of what they can improve, I recommend improving the mails adding more useful information :)

    0