This is an archived community post.

This post is no longer open for new replies - but we'd still love to hear from you! Share your feedback with our team via our Feedback Form.

Need help getting started? Check out this article for step-by-step instructions on submitting feedback through the form.

Edit content on Resources channels from onboarding feature is quite cumbersome

Smaugthur

I'm a moderator on a Discord server, and I was in charge of writing the server rules and resources using the Onboarding features. 
The thing is that since the channels set to be a “resource channel” disappear from the channels list to appear only on the “Server Guide” I'm unable to add new content to it, because when I access the channel from the “Server Guide” it a appears as read only and as I already say the channel disappear from the channels lists, and do not appear on “Channels & Roles” either, so there is no way to access the channel easily.

What I tried:
> The only thing that worked for me was mention the channel i want to edit on a message, and then click the link.

> Another option, is remove the channel from “resources” every time I want to add something new. But it seems quite cumbersome for something that simple. 
 

1

Kommentarer

2 kommentarer

Datum Röster
  • alvim utmex
    1. Editing content on the Resources channels from the onboarding feature can be quite cumbersome.
    2. Users often find the process unintuitive and time-consuming.
    3. The current system lacks a streamlined approach for quick updates.
    4. Navigation through the editing tools can be confusing.
    5. Changes made to content might not always reflect immediately.
    6. Error handling and version control are not always clear.
    7. The interface could benefit from more user-friendly design improvements.
    8. Better integration with other resources might ease the editing process.
    9. Users may need additional training to effectively manage content.
    10. Implementing a more robust system could enhance user experience.
    11. Including features like a strands archive could help track changes more efficiently.
    12. Overall, simplifying the editing process and incorporating advanced tools like a Strands archive could greatly improve content management on Resources channels.
    0
  • lopiccoloson
    • Redigerad
    1. Editing content on the Resources channels from the onboarding feature can be quite cumbersome.
    2. Users often find the process unintuitive and time-consuming.
    3. The current system lacks a streamlined approach for quick updates.
    4. Navigation through the editing tools can be confusing.
    5. Changes made to content might not always reflect immediately.
    6. Error handling and version control are not always clear.
    7. The interface could benefit from more user-friendly design improvements.
    8. Better integration with other resources might ease the editing process.
    9. Users may need additional training to effectively manage content.
    10. Implementing a more robust system could enhance user experience.
    11. Including features like a  could help track changes more efficiently.
    12. Overall, simplifying the editing process and incorporating advanced tools like a Strands archive could greatly improve content management on Resources channels.
    0