New rule for a Transfer Ownership-Request

Bình luận

2 bình luận

  • irischroma

    I think this is a really good work around. It could come into other issues, however.

    Main issue is that someone else could just run the server and run it to the ground, etc. It's a difficult thing to have control of. And I do not think people would like being pinged " You haven't used this server in a month" every now and then, because I am sure we all have our own personal servers we use to drop links and other resources for ourselves. (Or emoji dumps!)

    I think being able to have a voting system where the community can vote to have the owner/leader of the Server pinged to re-engage stuff is a good idea? Transfering ownership can never truly ever go smoothly... as some people just up and delete things without a warning when confronted with the fact the servers been dead so long ):

    Just common issues, but I do think having more integration for potential server transfers when the owner just isnt around/isnt active at all would be good. Looking forward to more ideas for this.

     

    0
  • Lucas47

    A server owner should always be looking his best, if he is not online a certain time of the week or something, it shows that the server has no future. Commitment is everything in life.

    0

Vui lòng đăng nhập để lại bình luận.