Feature Request - More granular support for pinging roles

評論

5 條評論

  • CyclonXT

    So I think there COULD be a workaround to this problem using a bot: when the command is executed (ex: !ping randomrole) the bot checks for the sender's role and using a database or a hardcode, prevent the bot from actually pinging. Then make the bot admin so that it actually works. Never tested it but might work. A full example of this would be:

    [User]


    !ping Gamer

     

    [Bot]

    @Gamer, [User] has pinged you!

    OR

    [Bot]

    You do not have the permission to ping this role! Please refer to a server administrator if you think this is a mistake.

    Again, I have never tested it but might work.

    0
  • 9yz

    Yeah, we're already working on a bot to do something similar, but a built-in solution for this would be so much nicer.

    1
  • CyclonXT

    I agree, as this is only a workaround and a very overly complicated stuff to configure and use. Though, while waiting for an update, we can't do anything and this is sadly the best we'll get. I bet at the very moment you and your team are done coding this bot, an update doing exactly that will release :L

    CyclonXT#6676

    0
  • Teriyaki Tuesday

    Why add features when you guys will do it for them?

    0
  • CyclonXT

    Because the bots me and 9yz are working on would be with a hard code, which means we would need to create a new one for each and every server, which is obviously not an option. With a built-in system, not only would it be easier to use both for the admin and user, but it would be one work that serves everyone.

    0

登入寫評論。