Roles less than Everybody

The Deejster

• March 11, 2020 19:04

It would be very nice to be able to have roles that are lower priority than "everybody." At the moment, if "everybody" has a permission, then all roles above it also have that permission, even if you turn it off for that role, meaning you can't have specific roles without chat privileges unless the @everybody doesn't.

0

• 

  Cecil Merrell

  • March 11, 2020 21:19
  • Edited

  You can make a role called Member and assign membership roles to that, then give the @everyone role nothing. You can then create a bot that assigns this role automatically to people that meat certain requirements

  1
• 

  The Deejster

  • March 11, 2020 21:27

  I know that it’s possible, I’m just saying it would be nice if it were a built-in feature instead of some series of workarounds

  -1
• 

  lurts

  • March 11, 2020 21:50

  How is that a workaround? The @everyone role is the lowest role by default to allow you to assign basic permissions everyone will get. It was always intended to add to those permissions with other roles

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.